Main | October 2007 »

September 2007

September 26, 2007

The Monks of Burma

I went to the Common Ground Meditation Center tonight in Minneapolis, where the guiding teacher, Mark Nunberg, gave a talk on the Seven Factors of Awakening. I've  been reading recently about the monks of Burma who are protesting the repressive government of Myanmar (Burma) by marching by the thousands in the streets, and refusing to take alms from government officials. I went to Mark's dharma talk listening for points of  connection to what's happening on the Burmese streets.

The Burmese monks' protest seems like an ideal case study in engaged Buddhism. After all, Buddhism in Burma is one of the  original sources of the Theravada/Vipassana style Buddhism that is growing fast in the United States; that is taught at the Common Ground Center; that I personally study and follow; and that is focused on  a simple practice of finding peace in one's heart and mind. What would cause monks who live out this practice on a daily basis to rise up in such an overt political action?

Mark's talk offered several points of illumination, which made clear why, if a political protest is carried out skilfully with wholesome intentions, it is no different from doing anything else in life. For example, Mark talked about how important it is to be aware of attachments that arise in meditation. This can be subtle and a difficult skill to master. For example, it's relatively easy to see how attached we become to  positive phenomena -- good food, money, the praise of peers, etc.  But we can also equally become attached to subtle spiritual longings as well -- happiness, joy, peace, calm.

When Mark said "attachment to calmness is craving," I saw one connection to the Burmese monks. By taking to the streets, those monks have abandoned that attachment, big time. They were giving themselves up to their experience completely, come what may, positive or negative. Presumably, they had also checked their intentions before they walked, to be sure they were acting from compassion towards the military government and not from hatred; and also had resolved, to the degree humanly possible, not to act on any violent urges that might arise during their marches.

Mark then dived into a really deep teaching that is hard for people to believe, if they haven't experienced it personally. And it opened another channel for me to the Burmese monks.

Mark was talking about mindfulness and pain. The two simply cannot coexist, he said, because the one cancels the other. For example, if you are experiencing pain and you bring mindfulness to the pain, the degree of mindfulness you muster, is the degree of pain reduced. The mindfulness chips away at the pain in degrees. For example, at first, you simply notice that with  physical pain comes a raft of mental activity that is  counter-productive, such as worry the pain will continue forever, that you did something wrong to cause the pain, that your life will be ruined thanks to the pain, etc.

The moment you realize this, the opportunity arises to let go of all that useless thought, simply because you see it's useless and there's no need to keep grasping to it. Then other, deeper layers of pain may be reduced by mindfulness. Just watching the actual physical pain for a while, paying close attention to it without exerting the slightest effort to relieve the pain or fight it, itself creates a healing effect. In  my experience, what happens is the pain tends to atomize, to break into small bits, so that the overall pain becomes much less monolithic, and much more a phenomenon of twinkling bits of sensation through which awareness can flow like water through a gorge.

In the Common Ground mediation room, reflecting in this way, I remembered a time in my life when I was bedridden for several months, dealing with severe pain during all of my waking hours. I remember how hard it was to deal with the pain. I was able to do it, but only by basically meditating all day long. Every time my mindfulness slipped, the pain returned, and I was reminded to get back in the moment, back to seeing things the way they were right now. I had mixed feelings about this.

On the one hand, I was intrigued by the experience and the wisdom I seemed to be gaining. On the other, since my life at the time, including the people around me, weren't set up to support a person basically meditating all day, I felt like a fish out of water. I could put my ambivalent feelings into the same meditative hopper -- "this is the way it is right now" -- but I never felt fully reconciled.

In any case, as the hour of meditation progressed this evening, I felt more and more open, rawer and rawer as time went on. All of this remembering of pain, and of the mindfulness I mustered to counter the pain, was making me feel painful and open. This deepened my feeling for the monks. To a new depth, I felt I could understand how those monks are feeling in their heart of hearts, and it can't be easy for them. They are surely feeling big pain. They are surely trying to muster big mindfulness to counter that pain, but they must be feeling ambivalent too, and struggling with that.

Tomorrow, I'll sign and send onwards an Internet petition that's going around, and I'll send a fax of protest to the Burmese embassy. When my own sitting group meets tomorrow night, I'll suggest that we reflect on the monks of Burma, as a possible prelude to further action. But whatever I do, I know I'll act with greater compassion than before, because this is what arose when I brought mindfulness to the pain within myself. The gap that opened between myself and pain, was suddenly filled with compassion. For myself, yes, but for others too.

Figuring out how to skilfully recognize, accept and direct that compassion, seems to me my next task. We'll see what happens.


Buddha #1: Josh Swiller

A famous Tibetan Buddhist training is to regard everyone you meet in the world as the Buddha.  That is, everyone you meet has something profound to teach. Figuring out what the teaching is, is your job.

I don't know if it's just me, but I've been finding Buddhas all over the place recently. The Tibetan training encourages you to find the Buddha even in horrible, vile people who act precisely opposite to the way you would expect the Buddha to act. That's not the kind of person I'm finding.

The kind of person I'm finding talks like the Buddha talks. They seem like actual living Buddhas, people who at least in one sphere of their lives have gained real wisdom, and have the ability to share their wisdom in a compelling way. 

My favorite person of this type is the Dog Whisperer, Cesar Milan. Time after time in his National Geographic TV program, Cesar walks into a home riven with human anxieties that the house pet has picked up and is acting out. With his patented "calm assertive energy" Cesar proceeds each time to cooly diagnose the problem and settle things down, usually dispensing gems of Buddhistic wisdom in the process. I'll write about Cesar and his wisdom gems of peace and tranquility soon.

And, I'll start adding a feature to The Journalist and the Buddha, of quick snapshots of all the Buddhas I meet and learn from along my own life's path.

Let's start with Buddha #1, a young man named Josh Swiller, interviewed the other day on NPR (thanks to my friend Alexa Olesen in Beijing for the link). Josh was profoundly deaf for most of his life until three  years ago, when he received a cochlear implant. Now he hears almost 100 percent.

Here is an exchange between NPR's Scott Simon and Swiller:

Simon:  Are there times, now that you are hearing the whole cacophony of sounds that is our world, that you sometimes miss the quiet?

Swiller:  Oh, sure. One of the most amazing things about deafness and the signing deaf community is that when you are deaf without hearing aids or implants you are alone with your thoughts a lot. And I think being alone with your thoughts, it promotes empathy for other people. Because you get to see that having a mind with all its complaints and thoughts and worries is not an easy  thing for anyone. If you ever spend time in the deaf community, it’s one of the most wonderful, compassionate communities. I think maybe with all of the noise we have in our modern world that gets lost a little bit.

The Buddha couldn't have said it better himself. It sounds to me as if profound deafness naturally nurtures the insights one seeks through vipassana or "insight" meditation. One such insight being what a huge  pain in the ass it is to have a human mind, endlessly storming off in all directions.

The theory of Buddhist insight meditation is that such insights tend to cause compassion to arise. And here we have Josh Swiller, saying this often happens for people who are stone deaf.

For the full interview click here.

Amazing.

September 18, 2007

Talking With Strangers, Talking With Buddha

ROCHESTER, MN -- Journalists talk to strangers. It’s what we do.

There is the biblical story of Abraham who,  while in the midst of an ecstatic conversation with God, is interrupted by three strangers who appear at his tent. Abraham immediately drops his prayer to take care of the strangers -- to wash their feet, to give them food, and to chat a while.

The spiritual benefits of Abraham's hospitality become known soon enough -- his visitors later turned out to be manifestations of God. So it turns out there's no difference between talking to God and talking to strangers, except that it takes time and effort to understand strangers as divine.

But talking with strangers in the ancient Middle East had distinctly practical benefits as well. They brought news of neighboring tribes, shared ideas about farming and herding, told of daughters and sons in nearby villages who'd reached marriageable age, and opened new channels for trade.

Anyone can talk with strangers, but it's journalism's central professional duty to do so. Across all barriers of race, age, nationality, color, rank or class, it's the journalist's job to ask questions of people who live across those barriers, to discover their news, their beliefs and conditions of life.

Journalism serves democracy by talking to strangers and by sharing their wisdom and life experiences with others. This brings strangers into society’s fold; and it brings us into their fold; which makes us not strangers but familiars.

The practice of talking with strangers strengthens society and democracy in innumerable ways. It evaporates dark secrets that could fester and explode. It alerts society to potential dangers, and it helps focus scattered resources on trouble spots when emergencies arise.

At the same time, talking with strangers extracts the most useful life wisdom from all of society’s members and shares that wisdom with all.

Over the past six years, I’ve talked to many strangers who are our fellow American citizens, mostly immigrants from foreign lands – Somalis, Cambodians, Mexicans, Chinese, Croatians, Indians, Sudanese, Ethiopians, Uighurs, Anuak, Iranians, Sri Lankans, Laotians, and others.

The  stranger who has made the deepest impact on me as a journalist and as a person – from whom I’ve learned the most – is both among the most exotic people I've ever met, and the most dead.

He is Siddhartha Guatama, a prince-turned-monk who lived in northern India in the 6th century B.C. He is known to history as the Buddha, the formal name he took after experiencing a tranquility of the soul so deep he felt compelled to spend his life teaching it to others.

This particular stranger has struck me as so wise -- his life experiences  and his teaching so profound and so relevant to our times -- that I’ve decided to spend a little more time as a journalist with him. I want to learn more, and to share more of what I am learning from this stranger.

Starting today, alternating with my regular Global Minnesota columns, I’ll begin publishing a series of reports of my encounters with the Buddha at The Journalist and the Buddha.

Keeping things simple, the topics I hope to cover include:

  • What might this wise stranger have to say about such modern-day challenges as terrorism, multiculturalism, immigration, identity-politics, corrupt leadership, and religious extremism?
  • Does world peace start with individual morality, and if so how can the two be realistically and practically combined?
  • Western Buddhism is usually about learning how to meditate as a stress-reliever, without discussion of the Buddha’s ethical teachings. Does that make sense? How can we become moral, without moralizing?

The Buddha was far from apolitical.  He led a large community of sometimes quarrelsome monks; he administered discipline to them as needed; he ordained women as nuns against prevailing social norms; and he gave advice to local kings and generals during times of famine, ethnic violence, epidemics and war. In so doing, the Buddha taught lessons of powerful contemporary relevance.

Avoiding moralizing and religious cant, the Buddha also defined simple steps that ordinary people  can take to address, to ease, and to solve personal problems and global problems.

We can learn from such a stranger.

At least, for a little, he deserves a listen. What have we got to lose?

What is the J&B ...

DOUG MCGILL'S "GLOCAL" BOOK

MCGILL'S JOURNALISM

Recent Posts